Wednesday 24 April 2013

Online Religion and Religion Online


Online Religion and Religion Online
by Chloe Y



Religion online (i.e. similar to Anastasia Karaflogka’s Religion on Cyberspace) allows access to resources people previously would not have had access to, such as ancient manuscripts and important scriptural sources, as well as non-canonical texts (in the Judeo-Christian faith). This is a great opportunity for religious people to extend their religious understanding, experience and belief beyond what they are taught at church or at home, by tradition and institution.

However, As Heidi Campbell suggests, a religious community’s lived experience and scriptural views on media inform their presence in the online world. As an Example, Campbell points to ultra-orthodox Jewish views on not recreating the Torah unless in traditional formats, such as handwritten scrolls. This is a contrast to Christian Protestantism’s enthusiastic adoption of the printing press as a god given innovation, and the use of printed material to advertise and proliferate their religious beliefs. This may point to the fact that Christianity is by far the most “surfed” religion, according to the graph below.
 

By accessing these additional sources of religious inspiration, people are able to interpret them in their own way, whether this is a positive or negative experience. In essence, religion online is allowing people to assess religion in a more rounded and expanded way, and draw their own conclusions from this.

Could religion online also be seen as a marketing tool for traditional forms of religion? Much like people like to go online and read reviews of restaurants, products or hotels before they go there or purchase them themselves – could the same be said for a church or religious tradition? By going online and seeing a plethora of information available on whichever religion they may be interested in, people could see this as an indication of transparency and honesty and make that religious tradition or church more appealing to them. Similarly through the use of social media, people could be more inclined to attend churches or religious practices their friends like, or that have a presence on social media. This is something Hutchings alludes to in his article, suggesting that much of the success of online evangelical movements is owed to their convergent use of secular and religious media. Evangelical sites appeal on their homepages to personal struggle and common issues of a secular nature, drawing visitors in, and only later advertise their religious ambitions and affiliations.

On the negative side, does online religion (and to some extent religion online) detract from the authority, reliability and reputation of ‘real’ religious institutions. The looseness of intellectual property, the openness of cyberspace and the potential for anyone to put anything on the internet could all potentially discredit the “truth” of religion found on the internet. The e-conversion evangelical movement, however, relies heavily on the personal testimony of ordinary members of its organisation in attracting new members. As Hutchings suggests, spiritual autobiographies of individuals legitimise their conversion and assert their devotion to Christ, in turn affirming the organisations evangelical credentials.

Online religion ad religion online are increasingly a part of the social fibres of the digital 21st century world. The use of both offline and online media will remain a key source for attracting new members to religious groups in the future, and the substance and legitimacy of online religion and religion online should continue to be analysed and questioned.
Picture Sources:

http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2001/CyberFaith-How-Americans-Pursue-Religion-Online/~/media/B544703B87EC4CE4B5AA41BA9C78E8F9.jpg?w=406&h=332&as=1

Sources:

Campbell H. 2010. When Religion Meets New Media. London & New York: Routledge. Ebook. Ch. 1: Religious Communities and the Internet.

Hutchings T. 2012. I Am Second: Evangelicals and Digital Storytelling. Australian Journal of Communication, 39(1): 71-86. Via RL and Informit http://search.informit.com.au.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/documentSummary;dn=775177112022985;res=IELHSS

No comments:

Post a Comment